Dancing around "The Brooch"

I was very interested by the way that Faulkner uses dancing to illustrate and describe the relationships between his characters. From the first page of the short story, the mother and son are paired off together. The first description of their relationship makes that clear; "She was a widow, he the only child" (647). Both characters are given equal treatment, 5 syllables and 4 words, and it is emphasized through the use of "widow" and "only" that all the two have is one another. The exchanges (or battles) between them have a back- and- forth quality similar to that of pair dancing. Never do the exchanges consist of more than a few sentences apiece, most often, each has one sentence and then the other responds in kind. They are fighting for control, for the "lead" if you will pardon the pun.

Howard's relationship with Amy also has many similarities to dancing. They pair up for a while, but when he proves to have "little co-ordination" (650) she finds other partners who can dance in the way that she needs and their relationship comes to an end. This is a great metaphor for their relationship. Howard turns from his partnership with his mother for a more "daring" (648)pairing with Amy, but his mother ultimately has control over their relationship. Howard and Amy have to sneak around his mother to be happy. Howard cannot leave her, and Amy cannot stand the control she has over him. The characters begin their own solitary dances. The mother tries to break up the couple. Howard sneaks around without his shoes on, and Amy further implicates herself as a loose woman by sneaking around on Howard.

None of the characters seem to be able to function without a pairing. Howard and his mother are very dependant upon one another. She needs to be taken care of and he needs her money. He never really leaves her until he kills himself but he does find temporary shelter with Amy. Amy sneaks around with others even when Howard does take her dancing, making her own pairings outside of their marriage. When faced with being forced to be alone with his mother again, he kills himself instead.

Women's Roles in Faulkner

In The Sound and the Fury it is the women who are the focus of the novel. It is they who keep things together and drive the story- if you can extract one. Dilsey, the matriarch of the servant family who attend the central white family. Her family has been with the Compsons forever. It is she who raised every child the Compson family produced, while Mrs. Compson lay forever ill in bed. She brings order to the chaos that is the Compson household. When Dilsey arrives at work on Easter morning, she immediately begins to set the house in order. She notices the clock, which strikes five times, and she knows that it's eight o'clock. She is also the only person in the novel who recognizes the inevitable doom that befalls the Compson family — "I seed de beginnin, en now I sees de endin."

Caddy is the central character, all of the characters speak of her and remember her. Her actions, getting pregnant and getting married off, only to be thrown out by her new husband, affect everyone. She and Dilsey are the only ones who understand Benjy's needs (Benjy is the first speaker in the story, mentally handicapped). But she is not spoken of in the family after her sins are discovered and Dilsey becomes the family's sole peacekeeper.

Elnora, in "There Once was a Queen," is strong like these women. She is introduced as being alone in a house "unmanned" (728), and though many men are named, none exist anymore for her but a young boy. The men in the story all have the same names, thus blurring them into a masculine soup and making them less important in the movement of the story. The reader has to work to even figure out which one is being spoken of! Even the "quiet" belongs to the "womenfolk" (727). She, like Dilsey, is tied to the family of whites, because she is related to them. She is a very strong character, who talks as if she needs no one, and seems to hold her family upon her shoulders alone. "I don't need no help" (728), she boldly assures herself. She and her offspring are the ones who keep the family together. Virginia is also introduced as a strong female character, being ninety in age, and having come to Mississippi with only the clothes on her back. Both characters are described as "erect" figures.

The women drive the story, and if they didn't, who would? There are no men, save the boy and the Yankee. The boy is young and plays a minor part, and the Yankee man admits his inferiority to Virginia. Elnora is wise, like Dilsey. She sees through the "quality" act of Narcissa to the "trash" that even she cannot see. Narcissa is only worried about herself (ironic name eh?). No one sees the other characters like Elnora does. She knows something is wrong with Narcissa earlier than anyone else. She somehow knows that Virginia is dying. It is through her that the reader gains the most knowledge and it is she who comes out of the story as the strong character who does not fade, as Narcissa and Virginia do. We begin the story with her and it is she who has the final words (much like Dilsey, who narrates the final portion of The Sound and the Fury).

Power Struggles in the "Young Housewife"

Who has the power?

The men in the poem seem to have the power. Barry Ahearn said "The poem focuses attention on various tangible barriers and containers, as if the poet were mulling over the structures that physically restrain the young housewife. The "wooden walls," for example, "of her husband's house" are the major physical barriers that hide her from the view of patrolling males, though it seems that this doctor's view has the advantage of x-ray vision, for he discerns her moving "in negligee" behind those walls. When she finally emerges, further physical limitations appear. The "curb" seems to be one barrier that marks the boundary between herself and delivery men. Another constraint is prominent by virtue of its absence: she is "uncorseted." Furthermore, the adjective beginning line 8, "stray," suggests her possible predilection for escaping orderly confines, whether in terms of hair arrangement or in terms of more serious transgressions. The poet, too, exists in a physical container--his car."

The wife lives in her "husband's house;" it is expressly stated that the house belongs to him and not her. The housewife is restrained by the "man made" things of the world in which she lives. The "curb," the "wooden walls," and the car in which the narrator drives by all separate him from her, and her from the world. The narrator speaks of her as a "fallen leaf" and then two lines later crushes leaves beneath his tires as he drives away, but he can only overcome her figuratively, as he does the leaf. Her husband can only restrain her physically, and she is pushing those boundaries by being "uncorseted." Even her hair seems to be fighting to be free of its restraints. When re-reading this it seems that she is spiritually free, that her body may conform to the restraints of the masculine influences and power in her world but spiritually she is free and beautiful.

The image of a fallen leaf does not have to be a sad image. The leaf is free of its protection, but it is also separated from the structures and confines of the tree. Natural imagery is often used in literature to describe the feminine presence as something unable to be tamed, something wild that cannot be put down by masculinity's dominance. John Milton sets up a direct correlation between the first woman, Eve, and the Garden of Eden from his introduction of her in his work Paradise Lost and though a famous example, it is certainly not the only one. I think that the image of the leaf used to represent the young housewife works in this way, as an image of freedom and an untamed and untamable nature.

Racism within Race

It is easy to see that the racism reflected in this short story goes deeper than that of white vs black. Within the African American race, distinctions were being made between light and dark. Racism is not necessarily a set theory, it changes and evolves; it has no single, permanently fixed set of characteristics. Rather than be opposed to the ideas of stereotyping and making distinctions based on color, the African American characters who dominate this story seem to be focused on creating and backing racism within their own race. The Blue Vein society, for example, is supposed to be for the social advancement of the race, yet those members within, some former slaves themselves, all seem to be white enough for their veins to be seen through their skin. Mr. Ryder is immersed in the idea of the whiteness of the woman he is interested in. In fact, he sets her apart from the others as the “palest woman he expected at the ball.” When the wife of Mr. Ryder’s youth appears, he must contend with the idea that she is very dark and very old, and accepting her will definitely not raise him socially. He can stay at the top of the social ladder by hiding the truth and marrying a beautiful, “pale” respectable woman in the Blue Veins, or reveal his secret and be linked to a little ugly woman from his all but forgotten past that is considered among the lowest in his race. Liza Jane would never have been considered appropriate to be introduced and accepted by the Blue Veins because of her dark skin color and the fact that she was formerly a plantation worker. It is obvious that Mr. Ryder struggles whether or not to reveal his secret to the Blue Veins because he did not know if they would be able to accept the fact that he was married to his ugly black woman. By showing the characteristics of the low that resided even with himself, his sympathy for the woman in his story, and the language that he accepts to tell it, he is able to persuade the Blue Veins to support him. It is as if he is issuing a challenge, a challenge for the Blue Veins to be learned and have an understanding of racial history and draw strength from that learning, rather than discriminate because of it.

Huck's Development

I think that Huck does develop morally over the novel in some ways. When we first encounter him he doesn't seem to have a lot of moral direction. He borrows (pun intended) his moral attitudes from others. This is common, children grow up looking to others, specifically those parental figures in their lives, for guidance; to know what is right and what is wrong they must be corrected and taught. His father believes that he is owed by the world, and that he should do whatsoever it is that benefits himself, no matter how it affects others. When Huck's father teaches him that stealing is really just "borrowing" the things which one desires, Huck takes on this moral rule for himself, and feels no guilt in applying it to his life. This form of adapting to other's belief of what is rigthand what is wrong continues throughout the novel. When Huck is being "sivilized" by Miss Watson, she teaches him the laws of behavior that are socially and religiously acceptable. Huck adapts to this system of belief, as seen when he feels guilty for disobeying the laws of the land in not turning in Jim; in fact he comes very close to turning Jim over to the authorities many times. Huck also steals the money which belongs to Mary Jane and the other orphans from the king and duke. He says, 'I felt so ornery and low down and mean, that I says to myself... I'll hive that money for them or bust" (226). His guilt motivates him to do what he knows is right, instead of what is best for him. This is the first time that we see Huck questioning the moral belief system that he has been fed by Miss Watson, who says it is wrong to steal, and his father, who would have either taken the gold for himself or stayed out of the duke/king's way to insure his own profit. Another instance of this questioning is when Huck writes the letter to Miss Watson to inform her of Jim's whereabouts. He feels good about coming clean, but he cannot shake the feeling that it is ultimately the wrong decision. He cannot decide between the laws and religion, and what he feels is his moral obligation to his friend Jim. Huck does not turn in his friend, ultimately deciding that he would rather go to hell. This decision is a turning point for Huck, a huge step toward moral independance. But we never see him lean on his own beliefs fully. He relies upon his father's system of what is right until someone with a higher sense of conviction corrects him. He then picks and chooses the parts of religion which suit him and still tends to fall back upon his father's teachings until Tom's convictions convince him otherwise. Huck says of the things which he took, "I called it borrowing, because that was what pap always called it; but Tom said it warn't borrowing, it was stealing" (279). From this point on, Huck refers to the action as stealing, not borrowing. But there is still no guilt because a higher authority, namely Tom, has declared it "right" (279) to steal in the name of a prisoner. Huck does not make this distinction himself, but he does choose to trust and follow Tom's system and discard his father's. In the end it is unclear where Huck is going. He could be headed back to Miss Watson, to continue his "sivilization," but I like to think that he will "light out for the Territory ahead of the rest" (320), and continue to develop his own moral system by "borrowing" parts he finds helpful from those around him.

Emily Dickinson

When reading “The name- of it- is ‘Autumn’” I thought a lot about what we did in class on Wed and where, in my mind, I add the punctuation This really does help me organize Dickinson’s writing and develop a reading of the text. The first two lines are sentences of their own in my mind, but they go together as if in a stanza of their own because the second line describes the subject, “Autumn,” introduced in the first. The next three lines continue this description of the subject and its color, making the color alive and real, not only describing the color but making a metaphor of the subject and blood. Then in the seventh line begins another metaphor of the blood. The winds (which in the other poem we discussed on Wed were associated with will and revolution) turns over a basin filled with blood and the blood “sprinkles” as rain. The basin and blood are acting the part of nature to bring rain, a substance needed to survive. Blood is also needed to survive but in “sprinkling” like rain, it means that life has been lost. The last stanza shows the effects of the blood being spilt. The blood falls upon lady’s bonnets, which I took to mean that the war affects the home and hearth in violent ways although not many women saw the front lines of battle or had to face oncoming enemy on the battlefield. The women are confronted by the battles from “far” away and the blood, pain and loss affects them by staining their lives and homes. The blood not only sprinkles upon them, but gathers around them in puddles. The effects of war do not just end with the end of war. The loss of husbands, children, and fathers affected the homestead long after news of the death of a loved one reached the family. The sadness and pain gathers, and the people lost to the war slowly drift away.

Beat! Beat! Drums!

Civil War historian Mark Neely claims that: "what…does not appear [in Whitman’s writing] is the Emancipation Proclamation....There would never be much trace of the proclamation in Whitman's works because he did not much care about it. For him the Civil War was not a war of liberation. It was a war for Union. Whitman was a mystical nationalist. And his big mistake was to depict Abraham Lincoln as a mystical nationalist too."

Just as the drum rhythm affects the poem and all of the people mentioned in it, the Civil War would affect everyone and everything that it touched in the United States. Whitman is trying to call everyone's attention to the war, and pay attention, to see the war for what it really is. Of course, no one can just ignore the war, it even awakens the sleeping and reverberates in the ears of the dead. The drums are enthusiastic supporters of the war, who encourage the population to be excited about the war and to join in the war efforts. All of the people hear this war cry and many respond positively, getting caught up in the excitement of the moment. The sounds "scatter the congregation" (which is not a positive image) and disturb the bridegroom, the farmer, the city traffic, the sleepers, the talkers, the singers, and the lawyers. All these people hear the war cry, but the timid, the old, the children, and the mothers do not react positively to the call. The poet exhorts the drums and bugles to drown their dissenting voices. The poet exhorts the drums and bugles to drown their dissenting voices. He uses words such as "scatter", "beseeching," "entreaties," and "prayer" to describe the actions and feelings of these characters. I see this as Whitman being very sarcastic, taking the voice of the war supporters and showing the flaws in their enthusiasm.

The poet is showing to his reader the spontaneous reaction of the Northern people directly following the South’s attack on Fort Sumter, and his analysis of it.The drumbeat is a symbol of war and it creates highly passionate, ardent responses from the townspeople described. The imagery brought to mind by this fast paced enthusiastic movement is that of a town, dancing and cheering their way to sign up for a war which has drawn them in by deceitful means, by the pressure of the drumbeats. Whitman is also communicating to the drums, which I see as those enthusiasts of the war, that war tears apart nations, not builds them. War leaves "no happiness" and is a "wild", "shrill", "fierce", and "terrible" entity. The war, Whitman tells us in the first
stanza, takes away things which it does not replace. The congregations are scattered, the scholar is taken from his study, peace and happiness are taken from the farmer and newlyweds, respectfully. The drumbeat is a symbol of war and it creates highly passionate, even extremist responses This is a beautiful poem which decries a torn nation and speaks a message of peace and the emptiness of war that holds true not only to its own era but also to future generations.

I think that Whitman is addressing unity here, the false unity that the war promises. The townspeople are unified in their efforts in the war, but it is NOT implied that their efforts are worthwhile or good in any way. In fact, the people are torn from the good things in their life, deceived by the musical tone of the drums into believing the promise of unity through destruction . Whitman is pointing this out and showing that war is not the best way to look for unity, since it tears apart the very people wishing to create peace.

Why can't he figure it out?

WHY DOES IT TAKE SO LONG FOR CAPTAIN DELANO TO FIGURE OUT WHAT IS GOING ON?

He is obviously naive and very trusting. He is liberal minded and wants to
see the best in everyone, even the slaves. That much is obvious from
the text. But he has numerous clues... the gorgon knot, the shaving
incident, and the incident with the two boys! What exactly is Melville
saying about NewEnglanders? :) Well I think that he is commenting on the innocence and naivety of New England as a whole. He is SO bad at reading people! He compliments Babo for being so faithful to his master, yet it turns out that Babo is the mastermind behind a murderous plot.

Here is what I think. Delano is blind to the idea that the blacks on the ship are intellegent. The admiration that Delano voices for Babo and the others is but a shade for the real racism that is rooted within him. He compares Babo to a "shepherd's dog," and the entire group of slaves are Benito's "little black sheep." So he is a racist masked by his liberal, trusting attitude.

Goodman Brown

Young Goodman Brown is set in the middle of Puritan rigidity to show the audience the consequences of such a system of belief. The Young Goodman Brown is obviously going through what the Puritan’s called a “conversion,” and he is seeing all of these people who he thought were truly converted themselves, and who seem to be good Puritan men and women, showing their true colors. Goodman Brown himself is literally walking with the devil toward his own spiritual crisis, passing through trials of the devil until the betrayal of his faith, symbolized by his new wife of the same name, crushes his will to turn the devil away. His faith has, until this critical point, been straightforward, innocent and untested. His young wife’s pink ribbons are a symbol of innocence, and they are discarded just before Brown’s reluctant acceptance of the darkness within himself. Where does Brown’s sin lie? According to the Puritans all men are born with sin. Brown obviously judges everyone that he meets along his journey, whether correctly or not we do not know. But rather than focusing on his own personal sins and problems he focuses on those of others.

When I read this story for the second time I questioned why then his wife Faith is involved in helping him TO sin. This is where I could be stretching it a bit.  The only answer based on what I know of Puritan values is that perhaps Goodman Brown, as a newlywed, was feeling guilty for enjoying the new sexual relationship he had with his wife. I see Faith having a double meaning, as being Brown’s wife, and symbolizing this new relationship to sin and marriage, AND as being used to symbolize his loss of faith and his giving in to this sin. His journey through the woods then symbolizes his fight against these feelings. He finds, then, that he is not the only one to face these troubles. Goody Cloyse seems to a good relationship with the devil herself, and I find it a bit odd that she taught Goodman Brown his “catechism,” as I thought that women were not allowed to teach such things as pertained to the church. And after all, Hawthorne does say, “there was a world of meaning in this simple comment.” Could this mean that Goody Cloyse was adulterous? As well as the other women mentioned in the story?

Meagre's Speech

At several places in this speech there are hints of Warren's interference into the thoughts and words of her character in order to poke fun at the Tories. Meagre does not speak as a Tory would have. He says that he hates the colonists, which is of course realistic as to what a Tory might have said, but he speaks of their stand as "noble," and their efforts as "generous," and sets them up as the defenders of an "injured country" against the "oppressors." The injured country is America, and the oppressors are the British, whom a Tory would support. This speech is unrealistic, no Tory would say those things about the colonists, and that makes the speech humorous.

Also, Warren brings to light with this speech that the Tories are not to be trusted. Meagre speaks of trying to bribe the senate, but the attempt was a failure. Warren is obviously poking fun at the incompetence of this attempt, as well as the attempt of the Tories to deceive the people, who "see through the schemes of our aspiring clan." Meagre even tell his audience that his mind is "venomed."

Byrd's Ignorance

We spoke of the ignorance of Byrd in class on Wednesday, in particular, to what degree he is ignorant, and to what degree he is sarcastic when dealing and speaking about the Native Americans. At the time I agreed with the side of the room which though him much more sarcastic than ignorant. But there are several instances in the text where he displays his ignorance in fine form. When he speaks of the division of labor among Native American families, he scorns the men for being idle. He takes no pains to learn their customs and traditions. He assumes that because in Europe hunting is only for sport, that for the Native Americans it is also a laid back activity. That of course, is not true. The division of labor for the Native Americans was simply different than the homemaker-breadwinner society of the British. The tasks that the Indians saw as feminine were often seen as work for men by the English. The Indian women, termed “poor women” by Byrd, while treasured by their men, were very hard working and provided their families with most of their diet. Hunting and fishing were not “gentlemanly diversions” for the Native Americans, but an important way of life, and a means of substance. Native Americans did not raise livestock, so they needed to hunt and fish in order to have fresh meat for their tables.

He also speaks of the Native women’s custom of sleeping with many men before the time of her marriage. He does understand this custom, but still seems to view it as a heathen practice. So although it seems that Byrd may be trying dispel and make fun of some of the stereotypes that Europeans had concerning the Native Americans, there are definite flaws in his understanding of their customs and ways of life. Ultimately it becomes obvious that he does not understands, and has made no effort to understand why the Indians do things differently, he just chalks it up to their being savage, and not Christian. We read that those Natives who are schooled in Christianity from a young age are sent home, and “immediately relapse into infidelity and barbarianism.” The Indians cannot be both Christian, and keep their customs, in the eyes of Byrd and Europe, so it is a "failure" to convert them, and to teach them.

Edward's Piece

I was very interested by Edward's distinction between the different kinds of spiritual light. Having knowledge from the Father means to "know the truth," as Simon Peter does. Knowledge from the Father is higher than any other, Edwards tells his congregation. There is a definite distinction, for Edwards, between the "light," or knowledge which comes directly from the Father, in the form of revelation, and the light or knowledge that comes from secondary source is very different. We are also informed that God is still responsible for conveying the latter type of knowledge through secondary sources "by the power and influence of natural means."

Edwards also makes an interesting distinction between having a sense of something and holding an opinion about that same thing. He says that a person can have an opinion about something by having knowledge of its existence. However, to possess such knowledge one does not have to have individual experience or even have ever seen the object. To truly have a sense of something, a "sense of the heart," one must have experienced and be able to appreciate what it is. Therefore one can have the opinion that Christ is holy and gracious by knowing the doctrine. But to have discovered "the divine excellency of Christian doctrines", is infinitely better and is the result of the Holy Spirit's divine influence.

By Way of Introduction

HI! My name is Maghen, I am from a little county called Caswell near the border of Virginia. There is no city where I live, in fact we only boast two traffic lights and one McDonalds. I grew up on something you might call a farm, bottlefeeding calves and playing all sorts of sports.

I LOVE Carolina sports, go to every game I can manage, and play intramurals wherever I can fit them in. I also love children and work part-time near RDU in Morrisville at RightTimeKIDS, a drop-in center.

I am taking this course because I love to read, and it supports my English major. I do not really enjoy poetry, but I am looking forward to the prose pieces on our syllabus. See you in class!